Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”

Authors

  • Edwin van Teijlingen Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
  • Bibha Simkhada School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK
  • Pramod Regmi Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
  • Padam Simkhada Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Vanora Hundley Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
  • Krishna C Poudel Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624

Keywords:

PhD, examination, doctorate, external examiners

Abstract

Getting a PhD is the highest possible education qualification which only a small proportion of all students achieve. As a consequence, examining PhD research in the form of a doctoral thesis is specialist work. This paper highlights the different options that are available for PhD examiners. There are four general options: (1) pass, (2) rewrite and resubmit; (3) lower degree, with or without resubmission; and (4) fail the PhD. However, from our experience, of both being examined for our own PhDs and examining others at a range of different universities, we have noted a considerable variety in detail within these common options. This paper outlines a variety of outcomes of a PhD examination, followed by four short case studies, each reflecting on a particular aspect /differences we experienced as examinees or as examiners. This paper further aims to alert PhD candidates and examiners to study the examination rules set by the awarding university, as the details of the PhD examination outcome, and hence the options available to both examiners and the students may differ more than one might expect.

 

 

Author Biographies

Edwin van Teijlingen, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK

 

 

Bibha Simkhada, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK

 

 

Pramod Regmi, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK

 

 

Padam Simkhada , Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal

 

 

Vanora Hundley, Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK

 

 

Krishna C Poudel, Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA

 

 

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Teijlingen, E. van ., Simkhada, B., Regmi, P. ., Simkhada , P. ., Hundley, V. ., & Poudel, K. C. (2022). Reflections on Variations in PhD Viva Regulations: “And the Options Are …”. Journal of Education and Research, 12(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jer.v12i2.624

Issue

Section

Reflective Paper

Most read articles by the same author(s)